The founding-client window is open — your category's AI answer is still up for grabs. Request an audit →

Glossary

llms.txt and robots.txt for AI crawlers

Optimizer360 GEO team · GEO strategists · 12 Sept 2026

robots.txt decides whether AI crawlers may fetch your pages. llms.txt is an optional Markdown map of the site. Neither file buys a citation; both remove avoidable reasons you are invisible.

Two small text files do a lot of GEO damage when they are wrong.

robots.txt

Search and AI crawlers honour robots.txt. If you Disallow: / for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot or Google-Extended, those systems are being told not to fetch you. That is a choice — sometimes correct for staging — and a common production accident.

A GEO-friendly policy typically:

  • Allows / for * except /admin and /api
  • Explicitly allows the major AI user agents
  • Points at your sitemap

Optimizer360.ai’s public robots policy is generated from a template that names GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, Bingbot, Applebot-Extended and others.

Confirm current official agent names in each vendor’s documentation before you copy a list from a blog.

llms.txt

llms.txt is a proposed convention: a Markdown file at /llms.txt that tells language models what the site is, which pages matter, and where the longer extract lives (/llms-full.txt). It is not an official Google ranking factor. It is a courtesy map.

A useful llms.txt is short, factual, and updated when you publish. It should not invent metrics. Ours lists who we are, the engines we cover, key URLs, and published articles.

ai.txt

Some sites add /ai.txt as a human-readable crawl policy that points at llms.txt, the sitemap and a contact address. It complements robots.txt; it does not replace it.

What not to do

Do not stuff llms.txt with keyword lists. Do not claim citation rates. Do not allow bots on staging and then forget to allow them in production — or the reverse.

Sources

FAQ

Is llms.txt required for GEO?

No. Crawl access, clear pages and trustworthy sources matter more. llms.txt is a useful extra.

Should we block AI trainers but allow search bots?

That is a policy choice. Be explicit. Blocking all AI agents will also limit answer-engine retrieval.

Also read